Friday, March 26, 2010

Contemporary Business Intelligence Tools

Contemporary business intelligence (BI) solutions should enable business users to easily author, publish, and distribute enterprise reports via a fully integrated report writer, with an easy-to-use report-creation wizard. Users will also have the power to customize and tailor reports to specific information needs. Report writing and graphing capabilities should enable even non-technical users to easily create and share clear representations of complex business conditions. In addition to being easy to use, report writers must also incorporate advanced features like exception filtering and highlighting, calculations with sub-queries, rankings, drill-through, and more.

Part Two of the Business Intelligence Report series.

In general, contemporary BI tools provide graphical analysis of business information in multidimensional views. Most companies collect a large amount of data from their business operations, and to keep track of that information, users would need to use a wide range of software programs, such as Microsoft Excel and Access (mostly on the lower-end of the market) and other, more sophisticated database applications for departments throughout their organization. Using multiple software programs makes it difficult to retrieve information in a timely manner and to perform analysis of the data.

The term business intelligence (BI) thus represents all the tools and systems that play a key role in the strategic planning process of the corporation, by allowing a company to gather, store, access, and analyze corporate data to aid in decision-making. Generally, these systems will illustrate BI in the areas of customer profiling, customer support, market research, market segmentation, product profitability, statistical analysis, and inventory and distribution analysis, to name only a few.

The BI applications have not experienced the "boom-and-bust" cycle of adjacent enterprise application areas, and their need has been neither over- nor under-hyped. It has recently become one of the key enterprise software sectors, given that skimpy IT budgets have espoused the importance of getting the most out of existing IT assets. BI should provide an environment in which business users receive information that is reliable, consistent, understandable, and easily manipulated. C-level executives and middle management have always had a need to understand their business' performance regardless of good or bad economic times, and while the output from BI might change, the need is always there.

Particularly relative are the recent massive demise of dot-com companies, moderately optimistic economic forecasts, the stringent Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX, see Attributes of Sarbanes-Oxley Tool Sets), and many other mandatory reporting regulatory requirements, such as those from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), following up the high-profile corporate fraud scandals (e.g., Enron and WorldCom) or bioterrorism threats. These have increased executives' focus on understanding and managing corporate performance.

SAP Industry Solutions for Mid-market Companies

For well over a decade, SAP AG (NYSE: SAP) has been offering market-leading enterprise

applications software tailored to specific industries, starting with the oil and gas and the

utilities industries (the original SAP industries). Other industries, such as media, insurance,

chemicals, banking, and the public sectors have followed, highlighting SAP's lesser-known side

as a market-oriented provider of industry-tailored solutions for midsized enterprises. For

instance, SAP software has mapped standard business processes as well as particularly specific

core banking processes in financial accounting since 1997, with solutions for other industries

following suit. Over the years, the vendor has created twenty-eight industry-specific products,

thus offering customers a mass of expertise, along with information technology (IT) solutions

particular to their respective industries.

This segmentation is also reflected in the company's organization: in 1996, SAP started creating

specialized departments called industry business units (IBUs) for groups of targeted industries,

such as financial services, manufacturing, public services, trading, and service industries.

Accordingly, the SAP NetWeaver platform and standard enterprise suites like mySAP ERP and mySAP

CRM, as well as applications for user productivity and analytics, have all recently been

designed with an industry perspective. Certainly, insights from SAP's core or standard

developments, along with partner solutions, benefit all of SAP's industry units, and cover

common business processes. But each industry has particular demands that cannot be met by

generic solutions, and SAP thus invests in complementary programs, with the goal of a complete

and integrated solution portfolio that will eventually support every process in each industry.

In close cooperation with leading industry customers, and with consulting and independent

software vendor (ISV) partner companies, SAP has created more than fifty SAP "solution maps,"

which chart consolidated best-practice approaches for specific industries. These maps are

checked and updated annually with the latest business and technical requirements, enabling SAP

to promptly react to regulatory requirements such as the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), Basel II,

and a raft of other environmental compliance measures. Many SAP solution maps even provide

specific requirements for sub-segments of certain industries. For instance, media customers can

leverage microvertical maps designed for broadcasting, entertainment, newspapers and magazines,

and premium-content publishing houses.

Consequently, perhaps, most of the chemical, high tech, and pharmaceutical Fortune 500 are SAP

customers. The vendor boasts eight of the world's top ten banks, thirty-three of Europe's

leading fifty financial institutions, and nine of the ten most successful insurance companies in

the world. SAP also claims leadership in ten of the eleven manufacturing industries it targets,

and asserts that over 900 utility companies in seventy countries are using SAP software, in

nearly thirty languages. To better understand the market, SAP maintains close contact with

relevant industry players, and organizes and attends industry-specific user events and forums.

There are a number of regional and international information days aimed at continuing an in-

depth dialog with customers, so as to identify new specific market segment requirements, and to

assess the vendor's current functional and technological fits and gaps in its portfolio.

SAP has also created advisory councils and architect forums for thought leaders from the

individual industries to maintain close and regular contact with the market, with the focus on

ever-evolving business issues and IT infrastructure landscapes. Finally, SAP also contributes to

the development and definition of industry standards as a member of industry associations,

standards committees, and various user groups worldwide. The best examples include RosettaNet

for the high tech and electronics industry, Chemical Industry Data Exchange (CIDX) for the

chemical industry, Petroleum Industry Data Exchange (PIDX) for oil and gas, and Automotive

Industry Action Group (AIAG)/ Standards for Technology in Automotive Retail (STAR) for the

automotive industry.

For instance, the Chemical Industry Data Exchange (CIDX) (www.cidx.org) is a nonprofit,

industry-funded standards body whose mission is to improve the ease, speed, and cost of

conducting business electronically between chemical companies and their trading partners.

Industry players, through the central coordination of the CIDX group, have created standards for

about sixty business transactions: this standardizes the transmission of data between chemical

company buyers and sellers. For example, in a transaction such as create purchase order, a 50-

character alphanumeric field that shows line #1 of the vendor address might be prescribed for

field #32. Using CIDX standards to transmit data via extensible markup language (XML) technology

means that everyone should thus know where to store (or look for) information, allowing everyone

to speak the same language when exchanging data. This enhances the industry's overall ability to

automate business and increase data visibility.

The Challenges that Remain for One Aspiring Global Sourcing Vendor

The Challenges that Remain for One Aspiring Global Sourcing Vendor

Despite Eqos's encouraging growth, increasing momentum, cumulative savvy, and indisputable experience as a provider of global sourcing and supplier management solutions for the retail supply chain worldwide (please see the previous parts of this series: One Vendor's Quest to Garner a Global Sourcing Ecosystem, A Retail Sourcing Suite Built on Experience, The Secret of One Vendor's Success in the Retail Supply Chain, and How One Sourcing Vendor's Offerings Are Bolstered by a Wealth of Services), it would be shortsighted not to acknowledge the challenges that still loom on the horizon for Eqos (www.eqos.com).

Eqos is, after all, still an up-and-coming company with a blossoming client roster (especially outside the UK), and with many product enhancements and improvements yet to be developed and launched. As such, the vendor still lacks global name recognition. Thus, many of the first few “proof of concept” customers came from the UK market.

As for penetrating the US market, fierce competition has already come from TradeStone Software (see A Well-designed Solution for Sourcing: Its Technological Foundation and How It Works). Like Eqos's solution, the TradeStone Suite is also a scalable, multitiered, server-based enterprise application built on the standards-based Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) development model, with support for Web services and extensible markup language (XML) that is leveraged for integrations (see Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose.)

The two vendors' offerings and aspirations appear to be similar, with each vendor sometimes being “accused” of copycatting the other's messages and offerings. Yet in their efforts to keep up with each other, the companies are in fact validating each other, as well as the market in general. However, the companies are approaching the market from different perspectives. While Tradestone is a relatively new software company, Eqos has evolved from its heritage as a consulting company with a collaborative platform into a provider of standard application service provider (ASP) hosted solutions.

The issue of expanding the footprint occurs because of the intricacy of global trade and international logistics—an intricacy that stems from having to involve so many parties or intermediaries and their accompanying processes. Namely, buyers, foreign sourcing offices, and agents that have to deal with targeted suppliers (contract manufacturers) in terms of bidding processes, contract negotiations, product sampling, quality and safety, the tracking of advanced shipping notices (ASNs), shipment status, regulatory compliance, financial settlements, supplier scorecards, bid comparisons, and so on, is only one part of the entire process.

But what about the other accompanying processes involved with compliance and testing partners, local and international third party logistics (3PLs), customs, financial institutions, distribution centers (DCs), individual stores, and so on? Accommodating and enabling freight forwarders, non-vessel operating common carriers (NVOCCs), consolidators, customs house brokers, export management companies (EMCs) and export trading companies (ETCs), shipping associations, shipping brokers, shipping agents, export packaging companies, etc. further complicates the picture. For more information, please refer to APICS Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) Learning System, Module 2: Building Competitive Operations, Planning and Logistics, 2007.

Also, the market in which all global sourcing vendors operate is characterized by early adopters, and it is rapidly evolving. A company of Eqos's current stature and means will be challenged to maintain its competitive position against competitors having significantly greater financial resources, name recognition, and other resources. The market is highly fragmented, and the intensity of competition can be expected to increase in the future, where competition might come from in-house development efforts, consulting companies, other software companies, financial institutions, logistic companies, customs brokers, forwarders, and third party development efforts.

As user companies continue to embrace the value of broader sourcing and global trade management (GTM) solutions, software vendors will often be looked upon to provide leadership and to add more value to the entire order life cycle, including purchase order management, total landed cost modeling, insurance and claims, import and export compliance, security regulations, and more seamless integration with invoice reconciliation and trade financing systems.

Given user companies' awareness of their need for GTM solutions and the like, there is a plethora of point solution providers that specialize in narrow areas of this growing yet fragmented market. Such areas range from landed cost calculation, retail product lifecycle management (PLM), visibility and event management, collaboration, export compliance, trading document generation, hazardous material handling, supply chain and production planning (see Production Planning and Scheduling Software for the Textile Industry: Unknown Frontiers), lead times, pricing or inventory optimization, and distribution order management (DOM), to more complete transportation management capabilities—just enough to muddle the message and nibble at the potential revenues of full-fledged retail sourcing players. For a slew of potential competitors in the market, see Challenges and User Recommendations for a Global Trading Solutions Provider on a Roll.

Eqos would likely point confidently to its focus on supermarkets and hard-goods and soft-goods retailers, its happy customer references, and the comprehensiveness of its solution, complete with business process management (BPM) and business intelligence (BI) enablement. However, even if not as well-versed and successful as Eqos is in these areas, some of the larger market players will likely be able to creep into a number of enterprises and reduce the share of the Eqos's account dollars.

While generalist sourcing vendors like Ariba and Perfect Commerce might not have the retail expertise per se, they might still cause the slowdown or postponement of some executive decisions. Additionally, given SAP's recent ecosystem push to recruit the “SAP Powered by NetWeaver” and “SAP Certified by NetWeaver” partners (see Multipurpose SAP NetWeaver), it might not take long before the giant partners up (or eventually acquires) with some of the above providers, thus creating a barrier of entry for Eqos and its contemporaries to its vast install base. The same could only be expected from Oracle given its recent appetite for acquisitions and for rolling them into the Oracle Fusion platform. And let's not forget the retail industry incumbent JDA Software of i2 Technologies.

Furthermore, given Eqos's needs and its intentions to broaden its channel abroad and to tackle industries beyond retail (for example, consumer packaged goods [CPG], consumer electronics, or pharmaceutical manufacturers), the vendor might end up with double the amount of investment (expenses) and additional competition from these markets' incumbents.

Provider of B2B Price Management and Optimization Speaks Out

Technology Evaluation Centers’ (TEC’s) series on business-to-business (B2B) pricing segmentation benefits (see Know Thy Market Segment's Price Response) and on upbeat news from one such solution provider, Zilliant (see How One Provider's Solution Covers the Bases of Price Optimization and Management), have prompted a great deal of interest and feedback from readers. The articles have also prompted Vendavo (www.vendavo.com), another prominent, privately held provider of price management and optimization software to B2B companies worldwide, to have an update briefing with TEC.

This briefing was done for two reasons. First, the vendor concurs that the market for such applications has been flourishing lately, as price management is receiving greater attention at the highest executive levels in B2B companies. Secondly, Vendavo wanted to point out its many recent developments in order to further inform the market about its offerings and capabilities, as well as dispel the lingering misperception that the vendor does not offer price optimization capabilities.

Life Is Good at Vendavo

Most recently, Vendavo—founded in 2000 and based in Palo Alto, California (US), with European headquarters in London (UK), and employing about 200—announced record results for 2007, following solid results the year before. According to a press release issued in February 2008, the vendor continued its aggressive growth and increased bookings by 65 percent in 2007 compared to 2006. Vendavo added 18 new customers in 2007, continuing the company’s rapid growth.

In 2007, the same press release reports, Vendavo customer deployments grew significantly in number: the company’s enterprise solution is now deployed (or in progress of being deployed) in more than 40 multibillion-dollar companies globally. Vendavo Enterprise Pricing Suite prices revenues in excess of $500 billion (USD) and manages tens of millions of price points.

Thanks to growth in new customer acquisitions and through continued investment by existing customers, Vendavo now has customers spread across multiple industries, including high technology, chemicals, industrial manufacturing, consumer products, mill products, oil and gas, and distribution. Some of the clients’ divisions include the following:

* two of the top five computer manufacturers around the world

* three of the top 10 Fortune 500 manufacturers of semiconductor

* five of the globe’s largest industrial manufacturing corporations

* six of the top 20 chemical companies according to Fortune 500

The SAP Factor

Vendavo attributes its success to both direct and indirect channel sales. The latter has seen a strong momentum as a result of Vendavo’s reseller partnership with SAP, the world’s leading provider of business software, with more than 33,200 customers in over 120 countries. SAP sources its SAP Price and Margin Management (PMM) application from Vendavo to complement and extend its SAP CRM (for customer relationship management) and SAP ERP (for enterprise resource planning) suites.

Geographically close to SAP’s North American research and development (R&D) center, Vendavo has worked with the enterprise applications giant for several years. Vendavo takes great pride in the seamless integration of its solutions and in the strength of its Powered by SAP NetWeaver certification and partnership. This distinction means Vendavo uses SAP’s Web Application Server, Business Intelligence (BI), Enterprise Portal, and Exchange Infrastructure (XI) components of SAP NetWeaver (see Multipurpose SAP NetWeaver). But now, with the reseller relationship in place, customers have been able to license a comprehensive, fully-integrated PMM software solution from a single source: SAP (see Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities). SAP has only a handful of strategic resellers compared to its large number of partners that carry the Powered by SAP NetWeaver certification. Vendavo is the only price management solution that is resold by SAP.

SAP worked closely with Vendavo for more than a year in reselling the pricing solution to SAP’s customers. Then in late 2006, Vendavo announced that it received an equity investment from SAP Ventures, a division of SAP. As stated in another press release posted by Vendavo in November 2006, it was intended that the investment would “help fund Vendavo’s product development, extending and deepening the links between its pricing solution and critical enterprise systems.” SAP Ventures then joined Vendavo’s existing investors, including Doll Capital Management (DCM), InterWest Partners, Mesirow Financial, Sigma Partners, and Split Rock Partners.

The same press release additionally clarifies the company’s hopes and intentions, as expressed by Nino Marakovic, investment partner with SAP Ventures: “By more tightly linking Vendavo’s pricing applications with all of the systems that support operations, sales, marketing, and finance, decision makers across the entire enterprise will have real-time access to the data they need to make effective pricing decisions.” For instance, Vendavo’s price management solutions, when combined with SAP ERP’s inventory availability, item costing, or available capacity and utilization data, could enable the creation of highly refined pricing solutions. In keeping with the plan to execute a joint product development road map over the next several years, integration is being built with SAP engineering resources on site. To that end, Vendavo has completed the SAP Solution Validation requirement, which is an exhaustive quality assurance process that all SAP applications go through prior to being generally available.

Vendavo’s partnership with SAP (wherein SAP sources its SAP PMM solution from Vendavo, the two companies sharing long-term goals for the product and working closely together to provide integration that is based on SAP NetWeaver XI and is extensible to other middleware platforms) has apparently delivered impressive results for both parties concerned. An enterprise-level pricing solution that is tightly integrated with other SAP applications, combined with superior global support (see No Yawn Intended: Enterprise Applications Giant Introduces a Mid-tier Support Choice), and the peace of mind that comes from purchasing from a global leader, has proved to be compelling for many SAP customers. A significant number of large deals have been signed, with SAP helping Vendavo expand more quickly into new vertical sectors (oil and gas, for example).

A Guide to Software Test Tools

Whether you are buying or making software, test tools help you get the most from your investment. A useful test tool gives you far more than efficiency; it will help you avoid trouble, provide vital information, and can enable your organization to take new opportunities with greater agility and strength.

Testing a system well is harder than building it. In the face of new risks introduced by the ever-increasing complexity of software and hardware, test tools may be your only practical way to be confident that you've got just what you paid for. From gathering the initial requirements to supporting the system after it has been deployed, test tools are available to support all phases of a project. This article looks at the ways that test tools can be used to design, code, and (of course) test a system.

Tool Vendors and the Test Tool Market

A handful of large vendors dominate the enterprise test tool market, offering integrated tool suites around a core product, and supporting the full project life cycle on a range of platforms. However, many users swear by tools from smaller vendors who offer a single tool, concentrate on one aspect of a project, or specialize in a particular industry, region, or technology.

The best-recognised, and perhaps most numerous tools, are test automation tools. These tools allow a machine to take charge of running a predetermined test, allowing those known tests to be executed quickly, accurately, and repeated as desired. Although clearly powerful, test automation tools have historically had a mixed reputation amongst practitioners—but have become more favoured as their technology, and their usage, has become more sophisticated.

However, the market supports a wide range of tools that may give you greater bang for your buck, some integrated with test automation, and some offering an entirely different way to address the quality of your system. Buyers who ignore these tools may be missing the opportunity to make the most of their investment.

Test Automation Tools—a General Description

Test automation tools fall into three broad categories; unit test tools, capture-replay tools, and load test tools. Each is described in the sections below. However, all test automation tools are built on the same basis. All use detailed scripts to describe tests and a set of expected results—and while the construction of these scripts may be hidden from the tester, they nevertheless introduce software engineering complexities. Trying to simulate manual tests—in particular working with point-and-click interfaces—introduces further complications.

Most tools incorporate functionality that helps to deal with this – from providing a fully-fledged development environment to recognizing objects in a GUI. Some tools allow skilled testers to leverage the tool's abilities with sophisticated scripting techniques. However, if used simply to mirror manual testing, test automation tools may help to confirm existing value, but are unlikely to highlight new risks.

Automated testing can produce unwieldy amounts of raw information; many tools provide functionality to process this into a more palatable form.

Tools Used while Designing a System

Design tools allow fundamental information about the plans for a system to be captured and shared, and are typically set up and used most intensely in the early stages of a project. Early consideration of testing can pay great dividends later in the project, and many design tools are built with testing in mind.

Requirements capture and analysis tools allow requirements to be shared across the whole team and controlled throughout the life of a project by creating a central repository and archive. They often allow requirements to be linked to documentation, code, and tests. Requirements management tools may be stand-alone, or part of a larger document management system. Complex tools may incorporate sophisticated natural-language parsing and validation, while simpler tools more closely resemble list managers.

Visual modeling tools allow system architects and designers to make models of the system and to visualize those models in a variety of ways. Formal diagrams may be used to create models that can be converted into code structures, tests, and data schemas.

Tools Used while Coding a System

Test tools used during coding are generally closely linked to the structure of the code. They are often called "white-box" or "clear-box" tools—a reference to their need to have visibility of the workings of the system. Many tools can be integrated with the build environment, running automatically in the background. These tools do their work on individual pieces of code, rather than integrated and configured systems, and tend to be specific to a particular language or technology.

Static test tools examine written code—but do not run it. They are an effective way of spotting a wide range of faults, which may be difficult to diagnose or reproduce reliably at later stages. Tests are based on coding standards and expected faults rather than any direct linkage to the functionality or requirements of the system, and will need to be adjusted to fit working practices. Some static test tools also provide functionality to help developers visualize code structure, measure complexity, and show the way that programs and data are interlinked.

The Best-kept Secret in the Product Lifecycle Management Mid-market

In the past decade or so of our coverage of numerous topics in the enterprise applications space, every now and then, we come across a vendor whose value proposition, product offering, and install base deserve much more credit and awareness than IT pundits acknowledge. One example of this is privately-funded Omnify Software, the Andover, Massachusetts, (US)-based provider of product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions. The vendor’s product content management solutions have helped over 200 original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and tier two and tier three electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers shorten development cycles, accelerate product innovation, and improve profitability.

Most of Omnify’s customers are companies with less than $500 million (USD) in revenues. Some are even pre-revenue startups, with the Omnify Empower PLM suite being their very first system of record, given they have no need for a transactional back-office system yet. Given that the vendor’s solution currently supports only English, the Omnify’s primary geographic markets are North America and Europe (specifically the United Kingdom and the Nordic region), with the industries served being electronics, mechanical, medical devices, and defense.

Omnify’s PLM modules have been successfully deployed with over 1,000 installed individual user licenses (in a floating, concurrent user licensing manner) within various businesses, helping them to more efficiently develop products, including wireless network platforms, soft-switch gateways, enterprise border controllers, advanced voice services platforms, aerospace navigation and control systems, digital and sonar imaging products, patient monitoring technology, and semiconductor equipment. As mentioned, Omnify customers encompass an array of business types, from start-ups such as Pacific Biosciences, Rivulet Communications, Still River Systems, and Wavestream to well-established corporations that include L3 Communications, Astronics, Acme Packet, and Cynosure.

Besides its headquarters in Andover, Omnify has offices on the US East and West Coasts. In addition to providing direct sales, consulting, and support services, Omnify Software has established a network of partners to deliver its PLM solutions as business ready. Currently, the vendor has 10 value-added resellers (VARs), which cover the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Nordic countries, which have the expertise and experience to help plan, install, and support the Omnify PLM solutions. Omnify assigns a channel sales representative to each reseller group, which, together with the direct sales force, adds up to over 100 sales and applications support personnel.

Omnify Software Genesis

Omnify Software evolved from Trilogic, Inc., the largest electronic design automation (EDA) VAR in the United States, and still a major Omnify reseller. In 1998, after many years of consulting with customers to help them create or define board-level design process flows and component information databases, Trilogic began to develop the Omnify Tool Suite. The result is today’s PLM system, which addresses the needs of companies seeking to improve their overall concept-to-design-to-manufacturing process.

The origin of Omnify technology is a universal bill of material (BOM) system developed in 1998 by the Omnify founders, and which is still in use by numerous OEMs today. OmniBOM is Omnify's BOM creation and processing tool for creating, editing and processing BOMs. With OmniBOM, users can import BOMs generated in other systems or formats (such as computer-aided design [CAD] and computer-aided engineering [CAE]), normalize, check, and analyze the data; and then automatically feed BOMs directly to other systems such as ERP/MRP or any downstream tool to easily integrate engineering BOMs with manufacturing systems.

According to one case study, OmniBOM provides a clear, concise view of all the changes to the initial BOM, and BOM comparisons are used to catch changes in the BOM from the customer, down to a single-digit change in the manufacturing part number. OmniBOM is lauded, by one customer, as its “most valued daily-use documentation tools [which also] ... enhances documentation communication with [its] customers ....” (For more commentary, visit http://www.omnifysoft.com/customers/Omnify-IMS-PLM-SuccessStory.pdf)

In any case, the PLM technology development began at Omnify in 2000 in earnest. In September of 2001, the Omnify product suite came to fruition with its first beta customer installations, while first customer shipments of the PLM system began in early 2002. Omnify Software was later incorporated in October of 2002. The solid electronic design and manufacturing process knowledge, and customer service-oriented background of the Omnify founders has given the company both a strong sensitivity to customer needs and a deep knowledge of what it takes to integrate engineering concepts, data management, and business systems.

Reflecting this customer-oriented philosophy, the company remains focused on allowing its customers to have a direct impact on the direction of the Omnify technology, ensuring a solution that truly meets their customers’ specific product development needs. To maintain this strategy, which has been in place since the company’s inception, Omnify technology provides an open-architecture PLM system that gives direct access for all groups involved in design and manufacturing processes and allows relatively easy integration to existing engineering and manufacturing systems.

Fast forward to early 2008 when Omnify Software announced exceptionally strong year-end results for 2007, exceeding revenue goals, increasing sales by 30 percent over 2006, and remaining profitable for another year. Omnify has reported steady growth, year after year, as the company continues to deliver comprehensive PLM solutions. The launch of Omnify's next-generation PLM solution, Empower PLM, was reportedly a key factor in the company's 2007 success.

Omnify recently transitioned its PLM technology platform to Microsoft .NET Framework in order to leverage advanced technology that provides a faster and more secure environment. The Framework enhances Omnify's existing open platform for third-party integrations and offers easier customization of user interfaces (UIs) and reports through Web services. This further supports Omnify's commitment to delivering a system that is easy to implement without disrupting existing processes.

While the product suite will be detailed shortly, for now, it suffices to highlight that project management, quality and corrective and preventive action (CAPA) management, and training record management are a few of the key new features or modules in Empower PLM. This new functionality has extended the capabilities of the system beyond traditional PLM to give users direct access to important product data that is often managed in separate systems. Empower PLM thus provides a mechanism to capture design, manufacturing, quality, service, and customer information and tie it back to the product record all within a single environment.

PLM’s Value Proposition, Revisited

Due to constantly changing product content information and shrinking product life cycles, electronics OEM and EMS providers need to enhance communications throughout the design-to-manufacturing process. Omnify Software offers a solution that streamlines the flow of product information among the design environment, both within the enterprise and its supply chain.

The drivers behind Omnify’s existence start with the typical (and yet unfortunate) disconnect between the engineering and manufacturing departments, where manufacturing is not aware of new product releases and revisions, while engineering is unaware of design issues impacting manufacturing and procurement processes. To make things worst, the traditional manual or paper-based processes mean no automated part request process and no electronic engineering change order (ECO) processing. As a result, everyone relies on ineffective (if not even counter-productive) means, like e-mails, faxes or phone calls, and spreadsheets to correct problems.

Last but not least, enterprise systems are still not integrated across all disciplines, so islands of information still exist. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems do not contain enough product data and are difficult to integrate into engineering tools. In other words, due to the inherent transactional purpose of an ERP system, most do not contain the detailed information that engineers need to drive design, including part specifications, design and test notes, and vendor-supplied documentation. In addition, ERP systems typically do not provide the security or capability to enable external manufacturing or supplying partners with direct access to product data or the ability to participate in development processes (for more information, see Can ERP Speak PLM?).

With no enabling technology to collaborate with external resources, the engineering department usually has no system to help manage “pre-release” product data. To that end, the PLM software enables companies to manage and support all the information surrounding their various products and parts—from the initial idea and subsequent design and engineering diagrams via BOMs, manufacturing documents, sourcing details, and maintenance data to product discontinuation, in other words, a “cradle to grave” cycle).

As its name suggests, PLM software was designed to manage product data throughout the entire product lifecycle, but is crucial during the design phase, where engineers need instant access to product data, including specifications, engineering parameters, and documentation. A sound PLM system centralizes all of this information for easy access by all team members by tracking and managing component data, BOMs, product documentation, engineering changes, and revisions, as well as compliance data. PLM systems should also offer the flexibility to support the many iterations of a design before it reaches the prototype and manufacturing phases.

A contemporary PLM system is composed of several elements, including foundational integration technologies like extensible markup language (XML)-based Web services (see Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, BPEL, and More) or more traditional enterprise application integration (EAI) tools. Its core functions typically entail data vaults; document and content management; workflow and program (portfolio) management; and information authoring tools and functional applications (see Critical Components of an E-PLM System).

The various sets of these PLM systems’ highly configurable software modules should be easily integrated with underlying engineering, design, and product data systems. Smaller companies often start with basic PDM to provide broader access and reliable documentation, but once the data is under control, more sophisticated workflow, collaborative design, and project portfolio management (PPM) or program management might follow (see The Many Faces of PLM).

Thus, one of the key components of a PLM system is that it provides an automated change management facility that allows dispersed team members to electronically propose product changes (so-called “redlines”) to BOMs, documents, and vendor or supplier information. By leveraging a workflow engine, these changes are then automatically routed to the appropriate resources for electronic signatures, and once all constituents have approved the change, the PLM system automatically updates the affected products with the suggested changes and then provides the updated information to the ERP system.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Dodge for the win - 2009 pickup truck comparison test

he new Dodge beats out Toyota, GM, and Ford. Surprisingly the coil springs make for a good tow truck.

1st Place: 2009 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie Crew Cab 4x4
After all the points were tallied, the Dodge Ram takes the win with a very well-rounded performance, despite being the priciest truck in the group.

We knew from previous experience that the Ram's coil-spring rear suspension works well when the truck is unloaded, but this time we found it has the chops to handle a trailer, too. The superior lateral stiffness of a five-link rear axle and a rear antiroll bar keep things from getting all swimmy while towing, even when we're late for lunch and with a winding road between us and a burrito plate. Later, the burritos stayed down because the Ram 4x4 is best at smoothing out washboard tracks and putting the power down in sand, as you don't get the insistent rear-axle hammering of leaf-spring rear suspensions.

For understanding the concept to truck comparison and using the information provided after making comparison, let us compare two famous trucks in United States. These two trucks are Ford F 150 XL Styleside Regular Cab, which would be referred as F in further discussion, and the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LS Short Box Regular Cab, which would be referred as C by us. Both the trucks are manufactured in same year, that is, 2003. Let us first compare the general information. The invoice value of F is about $17151, whereas in case of C, it is about $19688. These are standard invoice values and the actual price for which these are obtained in the market may differ. The list price of the two is more than the invoice price. List price of F is $19425 whereas the list price of C is $22500. Both the trucks fall in the category of large pick-up vehicles.

The satisfaction rating in percentage terms for F has been registered as 75 whereas for C, it is 81. In terms of general information, both the trucks are looking almost similar. Let us now compare the performance of two trucks. The engine capacity of F is 4.2L and is six cylinders whereas the engine capacity of C is 4.3L and is six cylinders. Both of them are right wheel drive. The transmission speed of both the trucks is same and the compression ratio is also the same, which is 9.20:1. So far the horsepower is concerned, F is having horsepower of 202 hp and is able to provide 4800 rpm whereas the horsepower of C is about 200hp and is able to provide 4600rpm. The torque of F is 252 at the rate of 3400 whereas the torque of C is 260 at the rate of 2800. The cylinder bore of F is about 3.81 whereas the cylinder bore of C is 4.00. The gallon tank of F can hold 30 lit whereas the gallon tank of C can hold 26 lit. The fuel delivery of F is SEFI whereas of C, it is MPFI. Thus, if the performance of two is compared, it can be said that F is having a slight edge over C despite the fact that the cylinder size is small as compared to C. Since it is available with lower price, most of persons would like to go for F, except those persons that like MPFI engines.

The above example helps us in understanding how the comparison between trucks, whether two or three can be made and best can be selected. There are other variable also for which the trucks can be compared which includes dimensions of truck, convenience features etc

Compare Trucks

Truck is a vehicle that is used for the purpose of transporting different types of materials like equipment, bulk goods etc. There are many names by which trucks are called as like Lorry, which is the name used for heavy trucks in United Kingdom, Heavy Good Vehicles, which is the term that is used for heavy trucks in United States etc. There are many manufacturers of trucks and each of them is different from other in some features. Thus, when a person or a fleet operator etc wishes to buy a truck, he has to ensure that the truck he is buying is the best that suits his needs. This can be done by way of truck comparison. Truck comparison is the process in which different available trucks are compared so as to find the best truck available. Trucks are sometime called as pickup vans etc also. It is not necessary that only vehicles with heavy body and large capacity are trucks. Smaller vehicles that have small capacity and used for carrying goods etc from one place to another are also included in the category of trucks.

There are many sources of making comparison between the different types of trucks available in the market. Most important among these are the online sources. There are of course many aspects that are taken into consideration for making truck comparison like interior details, exterior parts, price of truck, engine specifications, mileage, etc. It is important to note here that a person is able to make the best comparison when the two or three trucks, that are available, are compared side by side so that each aspect of different types of trucks is compared. For making a truck comparison, it is very important that a person should know about the different types of trucks that are available in the market. For example, if a person is comparing trucks in United States, different brands of trucks available are Cadillac, Isuzu, Nissan, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Ford, Honda, Chevrolet etc. Mostly, the comparing sources also provide pictures of these trucks and a person can easily sort the trucks by pictures. Used trucks can also be compared, as there are many sources that provide necessary information about them.

Most of the online sources require a person to make selection among different choices so as to make comparison among different types of trucks. There are two options that are required to be selected. The first field in both the options is the year. The year of manufacture has to be entered in this. If new trucks are being compared, current year is normally the year of manufacture. In case of used trucks, the year can be found out in registration papers etc. The second option that a person is required to enter is the make. This means the name of manufacturer of truck like Nissan etc. The third option is model. Since there are many models of trucks that are manufactured by each truck manufacturer, a person is required to provide the exact name of the model. Most of the online sources help a person in entering all the information required above by way of drop-downs that contain specific information. One all the information is entered; a person can easily make a comparison among different trucks and can find the best among them.

2010 Honda Accord Crosstour vs. 2009 Toyota Venza


" You don't choose cars like these, you succumb to them. They creep up on you like thin hair and thick ankles. One minute you're rolling a 3 Series coupe, the next minute your wife needs room to haul her gardening stuff and the kids want rear doors and a DVD player. It's about that time when wagon-style things like the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour and 2009 Toyota Venza start to look attractive. OK, plausible maybe. With extra cargo room and a more comforting view of the road, these tall wagons are sort of like SUVs, only without the guilt of a gas-sucking V8 under the hood. You won't find any big, heavy truck parts underneath their skins either. Granted, neither the Honda nor the Toyota is going to do much for your image. In fact, you can pretty much kiss good-bye whatever sliver of cool you still had left. There are no wheels tall enough nor tires wide enough to make either of these vehicles look tough. These are wagons, and it's what's inside that counts. Don't worry, though. Your friends may wince, but your family will love you. The Station Wagon Is Back Honda and Toyota have done their best to position these vehicles as something entirely new, crossovers that defy categorization — segment-busters, if you will. But once you cut beneath the marketingspeak, the Crosstour and the Venza are essentially Accord and Camry wagons. There should be no shame in such vehicles, and both the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour and the 2009 Toyota Venza have the mainstream persona adopted over the years by the Accord and Camry. When you compare them with sedans, there are a few notable differences like the higher ride height and optional all-wheel-drive systems. And for better or worse, both feature unique styling. Some of this is helpful. The fact that both vehicles are treated as premium versions of their respective sedans is slightly less so. Yes, you must pay up for the privilege of piloting these suburban carry-alls. The cheapest Honda Accord Crosstour starts at just under $30K for a front-wheel-drive model with a V6. The Venza offers a base model with an inline-4, but even that starts at $26K. Get loaded-up versions as we did and you're looking at $37,000 for the Honda and just over $39,000 for the Toyota. Did you think the latest in car-based family transportation was going to be cheaper than some primitive pickup-based SUV? No chance, but at these prices these crossovers do include numerous family-friendly gadgets, like navigation systems, high-end stereos, heated leather seats, plus the requisite back-up camera so you don't run over the dog."

Full-Size Pickup Truck Comparison Test Drives


DETROIT — The automotive world is downsizing. The high cost of fuel has forced automakers to shrink both the size of vehicles and sales expectations, too. Big, thirsty and, yes, profitable vehicles just aren't moving off dealer lots the way they used to. Instead it's the fuel-efficient smaller cars—not to mention the promise of pure EVs and new plug-in hybrids—that have commanded consumer attention. So it's no surprise that full-size pickups are feeling the heat. As if the worldwide financial meltdown wasn't enough, this long-term trend is tough news for Motown and every other town in the U.S. that builds pickup trucks. Despite this downturn, the market for full-size pickups is still massive. This year, about 2 million of them will enter service across the country. Americans still need these workhorses to do the dirty, laborious work they were designed to do. We still tow boats, we still carry tools to the job site, and we most certainly still need a pickup bed to haul lumber and Sheetrock for our home-improvement projects. Click to enlarge 2009 Full-Size Pickup Truck Comparison Stats The good news: Today's pickups are the most capable, fuel-efficient and useful trucks ever. We know because we were the first to gather the five newest full-size pickups from Chevy, Dodge, Ford, Nissan and Toyota for an exclusive showdown here in the town where pickup trucks were invented. Dodge and Ford have rolled out all-new entries for 2009, so the timing was right for a comparison of the new and established players—and we're rolling out our test results early so you can read them here first. We requested four-wheel-drive crew-cab models because they make up about half of the light-duty, full-size market. We ran them hard, measuring acceleration and braking—both unloaded and with 966 pounds in the bed. We evaluated handling and real-world fuel economy, too. We also hitched a 7560-pound 22-ft-long enclosed car hauler to the trucks to gauge how each one behaves when towing. Since these pickups all have generous rear seats, we spent time evaluating those perches and, of course, got friendly with the various onboard electronic systems. In the end, we learned that all of these trucks are capable work machines. The hardest part? Picking the winner. Read on for PM's first-look, truck-by-truck breakdown, followed by a crunch-the-numbers roundup that every new pickup buyer needs to know.

Friday, January 29, 2010

How Does This Help Keep Your Selection Projects Focused

I said at the beginning that properly defining your functional and technical requirements is a critical part of your software selection project. After all, the goal is to find the best software for your business, and your needs have to come first.

Using a TEC Evaluation Center removes much of the overhead of a traditional selection project, leaving you with more time to pay attention to what you need—and whether the vendors can deliver it.

For one thing, in an Evaluation Center, you model and prioritize your requirements using the exact structure found in TEC’s RFIs—the same RFIs that vendors respond to. So you can see exactly where a vendor does and doesn’t support your requirements, and make apples-to-apples comparisons of competing vendors. That makes the comparison process a whole lot faster.

For another thing, because the Evaluation Centers already contain vendor RFI responses, you don’t need to spend time collecting and validating RFIs to develop your initial short list of vendors. And while you will eventually need to send RFIs to the vendors who make the short list, you can load their responses into the Evaluation Center and do the same kind of quick, unbiased evaluation and comparison you did to arrive at a short list in the first place.

And for yet another thing, TEC’s Evaluation Centers have analysis tools built right in, so you don’t need to spend time building and troubleshooting complicated spreadsheets (if you’ve been through a selection project before, you’ll immediately recognize what a time-saver this is). ebestmatch handles the underlying computations and displays the results in the Evaluation Center interface, using clear, easy-to-understand graphs, charts, and reports. You can see how the vendors perform at any level—from broad functional areas to individual features and functions.

Oh, and just so you know: every Evaluation Center is set up to guide you through the selection process according to TEC’s proven selection methodology, so you can be sure you’re going about things the right way.

Keep Your IT Projects Focused with TEC’s Evaluation Centers

Here at TEC, we spend a lot of time talking about how easily software selection projects can go wrong. One mistake we see over and over is that companies fail to properly define their functional and technical requirements—the things that their new software must do and support.

That’s a big problem—because accurate, well-defined requirements are a critical part of any selection project. Get them right and you’re on the road to success. Get them wrong, or take shortcuts, and you risk making a bad choice. Worse still, you may not even know how bad a choice it is until after the implementation—when it’s too late.

But putting your requirements first isn’t always easy. Software selection is a juggling act, and your requirements aren’t the only ball you need to keep in the air. You’ve also got to analyze reams of data from vendors (some of it fact, some of it marketing hype) to find out if their products actually meet your requirements. And you need to make sure that you’re analyzing those data the right way—using the right tools and a proven methodology.

That’s where TEC’s Evaluation Centers come in—helping you stay focused on your requirements without dropping anything else.

So What Is an Evaluation Center?

Our Evaluation Centers are dedicated, online environments for software selection. Each Center contains everything you need to compare a particular type of enterprise software solution, and include:

A structured method for defining and prioritizing your requirements: The Evaluation Center interface lets you work from a model of industry standard features and functions where you can identify the features and functions you need and set priorities to define their relative importance. Structuring your requirements this way makes it easy to see how well vendors support them. But more on that in a moment.

Detailed vendor information: We ask vendors in dozens of industries to respond to detailed requests for information (RFIs) so we know how well their solutions support thousands of industry-standard features and functions. Once it is vetted by our analysts, this information ends up in our knowledge bases (KBs), along with articles, white papers, and other relevant data.

Every Evaluation Center gives you access to one or more KBs, so you have up-to-date information about hundreds of vendor solutions at your disposal—information that would be, at best, difficult and time-consuming to gather on your own.